TIGIT Setback: iTeos and GSK Halt Development of Cancer Immunotherapy

In a significant blow to the field of cancer immunotherapy, iTeos Therapeutics and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) have announced the termination of their collaboration on belrestotug, a promising TIGIT-blocking drug. This decision comes after disappointing results in a Phase 2 clinical trial, marking another setback for the TIGIT class of cancer treatments that have struggled to meet expectations.
Phase 2 Trial Results Fall Short
The Phase 2 trial, which combined belrestotug with GSK's Jemperli (dostarlimab), failed to significantly delay tumor progression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. While the drug combination showed a trend towards improved outcomes, it fell below the predetermined threshold for meaningful clinical benefit. Additionally, results in head and neck cancer patients were similarly underwhelming.
iTeos CEO Michel Detheux stated, "Based on these results, we are taking immediate steps to preserve capital and have initiated a strategic review to evaluate alternatives that will maximize shareholder value."
Implications for TIGIT Research
The failure of belrestotug is the latest in a series of disappointments for TIGIT-targeting therapies. Once hailed as a potential breakthrough in cancer treatment, TIGIT inhibitors have faced numerous clinical setbacks in recent years:
- Several major pharmaceutical companies, including Roche, Merck & Co., Bristol Myers Squibb, and Gilead Sciences, have invested heavily in TIGIT research.
- Multiple clinical trials have failed to demonstrate significant improvements in patient outcomes.
- Some companies have already terminated their TIGIT programs in response to negative results.
Despite these setbacks, not all hope is lost for the TIGIT class. Gilead and Arcus Biosciences continue to pursue a Phase 3 trial of their TIGIT inhibitor in gastrointestinal tract cancer, with results expected next year.
Financial Ramifications
The termination of the iTeos-GSK collaboration carries significant financial implications:
- GSK initially paid iTeos $625 million upfront in 2021 for the rights to belrestotug.
- The deal included potential milestone payments of up to $1.45 billion.
- iTeos will no longer receive these future payouts, prompting a strategic review of the company's operations.
As the pharmaceutical industry continues to grapple with the challenges of developing effective cancer immunotherapies, the belrestotug setback serves as a reminder of the complexities and risks inherent in drug development. The coming months will likely see increased scrutiny of ongoing TIGIT research and a potential reassessment of investment strategies in this area of oncology.
References
- iTeos, GSK to shelve TIGIT drug after study setback
The failure is the latest stumble for a cancer drug class that hasn’t lived up to expectations. iTeos will begin a strategic review in response.
Explore Further
What were the specific criteria used to determine the threshold for meaningful clinical benefit in the Phase 2 trial of belrestotug and Jemperli?
How do the financial implications of the terminated iTeos-GSK collaboration compare to other halted drug development partnerships in the industry?
What is the current status of TIGIT inhibitor research among major pharmaceutical companies that previously invested heavily in this drug class?
What distinguishes Gilead and Arcus Biosciences' TIGIT inhibitor approach from others that have faced clinical setbacks?
What alternative strategies might iTeos pursue to maximize shareholder value following the termination of their collaboration with GSK?