Roche's Perjeta-Based Regimen Shows Long-Term Survival Benefit in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Roche has unveiled compelling long-term survival data for its Perjeta-based regimen in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, reinforcing the treatment's position as a standard of care in the adjuvant setting. The Swiss pharmaceutical giant presented the results from its phase 3 APHINITY study at the 2025 European Society for Medical Oncology Breast Cancer Congress, demonstrating sustained benefits after a decade of follow-up.
Significant Survival Advantage in Long-Term Study
The APHINITY trial, which included 4,804 patients, evaluated a post-surgery regimen of Perjeta (pertuzumab), Herceptin (trastuzumab), and chemotherapy against a control arm of Herceptin, chemotherapy, and placebo. After ten years, the Perjeta-based regimen showed a statistically significant 17% reduction in the risk of death compared to the control group.
Specifically, 91.6% of patients treated with the Perjeta combination were alive at the ten-year mark, compared to 89.8% in the control arm. Dr. Levi Garraway, Genentech's chief medical officer and head of global product development, emphasized that these results "validate the sustained benefits of the Perjeta-based regimen" and "reinforce the regimen's value as a well-established standard-of-care treatment in the curative setting."
Enhanced Benefit for High-Risk Patients
The study revealed an even more pronounced benefit for patients with lymph node-positive disease, who are at higher risk of recurrence. This subgroup experienced a 21% reduction in the risk of death when treated with the Perjeta-based regimen.
Dr. Sibylle Loibl, CEO of the German Breast Group Forschungs and APHINITY study chair, noted that the addition of Perjeta to the standard post-surgical treatment appears "most beneficial for people with HER2-positive breast cancer with lymph node-positive disease who are at high risk of recurrence."
Perjeta's Market Position and Future Outlook
Despite the prevalence of Herceptin biosimilars, Perjeta continues to be a strong performer for Roche. In 2024, Perjeta generated approximately $4.3 billion in sales, while Herceptin contributed $1.6 billion. However, the landscape may change as Shanghai Henlius Biotech's Perjeta biosimilar candidate was accepted for FDA review in February 2025.
The pharmaceutical industry is closely watching the evolution of HER2-positive breast cancer treatment. Recently, AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo's antibody-drug conjugate Enhertu, in combination with Perjeta, demonstrated superiority over the standard Perjeta, Herceptin, and chemotherapy regimen in delaying tumor progression or death for patients with newly diagnosed HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
As competition intensifies and biosimilars enter the market, Roche's long-term data for the Perjeta-based regimen may play a crucial role in maintaining its position in the HER2-positive breast cancer treatment landscape. Industry analysts project that Roche will become the largest drugmaker by sales in 2025, highlighting the continued importance of its oncology portfolio.
References
- Roche spotlights Perjeta's staying power with 10-year breast cancer survival results
After a decade of follow-up, Roche's Perjeta, Herceptin and chemotherapy regimen cut the risk of death by 17% in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer.
Explore Further
What are the efficacy and safety data from the APHINITY study for the Perjeta-based regimen compared to its main competitors?
What are the potential impacts of Shanghai Henlius Biotech's Perjeta biosimilar candidate on Roche's market position once it is approved?
What are the recent sales figures and market strategies for competitors like AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo with products targeting HER2-positive breast cancer?
How significant is the target market size for HER2-positive breast cancer treatments, and how does it influence Roche's oncology portfolio?
What were the specific advantages highlighted in the APHINITY study that could help Perjeta maintain its market dominance despite emerging biosimilars?